Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3976110
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T04:45:55+00:00 2026-05-20T04:45:55+00:00

I’m using a many-to-one relationship as follows: Classes: public class Account { public virtual

  • 0

I’m using a many-to-one relationship as follows:

Classes:

public class Account
{
    public virtual long AccoungID { get; set; }
    public virtual string UserName { get; set; }
}

public class AnotherClass
{
    public virtual long AClassID { get; set; }
    public virtual Account Account { get; set; }
}

Mappings:

  <class name="Account">
    <id name="AccountID">
      <generator class="hilo"/>
    </id>
    <property name="Username"/>
  </class>  

  <class name="AnotherClass">
    <id name="AnotherClassID">
      <generator class="hilo"/>
    </id>
    <many-to-one name="Account" class="Account" column="AccountID"/>
  </class>

This is working fine, with a lazy read on the Account property of an instance of AnotherClass.

However, due the application I’m working in, there will be many instances of AnotherClass, with a high throughput. There will only be a handful of Accounts though. The Accounts are already cached in memory in a List. I can guarantee that the Accounts list in memory matches that in the database.

Rather than the lazy read hitting the database for account details I want to intercept the either the population of the object or the lazy read and reference the right item in the cached accounts list. This gives two advantages – much fewer selects, and any changes to the accounts will automatically be reflected in instances of AnotherClass as they’ll all reference the same instance of the Account.

Because of the lazy read, I can access the AnotherClass.Account.AccountID property without incurring the extra select. Hopefully that’ll provide a way in.

I still want the adds/updates/removes on the AnotherClass object to update the AccountID property.

So the question is: How might I go about filling the Account property with details from the cached list instead of the database, based on the AccountID from the AnotherClass table?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T04:45:56+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 4:45 am

    Since the Account you have cached belongs to another session I think you can create an interceptor ( look at here: http://weblogs.asp.net/srkirkland/archive/2009/09/03/simple-auditing-using-an-nhibernate-iinterceptor-part-2.aspx ) and when an object is loaded that needs an Account you can lock the reference to the current session and assign it to the property. A less intrusive way can be implement yourself ( or use an existing ) second level cache.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.