Home/ Questions/Q 6780821
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-26T16:33:05+00:00

Im using dotnet c#, and jQuery plus webservices for ajax calls. My paginations works

  • 0

Im using dotnet c#, and jQuery plus webservices for ajax calls. My paginations works like twitter and facebook paginations. In the onload event, a ajax call fill a content area with 10 rows, and a click or a roll the page down event call the same ajax call, with a page parameter, that brings more 10 rows, and so on. I dont have a canonical pagination for non javascript users. I read the Google specification about crawlable ajax, but Im not sure how to convert my model to the google new model.

First of all, I use jQuery ajax post, using json format. So its possible to create a aspx page that read a URL like http://www.domain.com/search.aspx?_escaped_fragment_=somevalue and use the _escaped_fragment_ value to return content. But, somehow I have to propagate this page link to the google crawler http://www.domain.com/search.aspx#!somevalue. Is this ok?

Ok! But when the Google Crawler access my paginations, the crawler will not see any link to http://www.domain.com/search.aspx#!1, unless I point it in the sitemap, and it makes no sense to me. Im in a big mess. Can someone give me a tip?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    Lets try:

    Consider a link to a page, like www.domain.com/search.aspx?query=google#1.

    The page search.aspx must have a function that reads the hash, and get content relative to the page 1. Part of this content is www.domain.com/search.aspx?query=google#2. The function do the same, but now it gets content relative to page 2. And so on.

    Now I have to exchange the #1 and #2 to #!1 and #!2. My logic goes the same, but google crawler will call www.domain.com/search.aspx?query=google&_escaped_fragment_=1, and I will have to create a url route that redirect this url to some page that will return a html snap shot for the result.

    Is that right?

    • 0