Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5951541
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T17:33:07+00:00 2026-05-22T17:33:07+00:00

I’m using Hibernate + spring + @Transactional annotations to handle transactions in my application.

  • 0

I’m using Hibernate + spring + @Transactional annotations to handle transactions in my application.

Transaction manager is declared as follows:

<bean id="transactionManager" class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateTransactionManager">
    <property name="sessionFactory" ref="sessionFactory"/>
</bean>

<tx:annotation-driven transaction-manager="transactionManager"/>

This works well in most cases, but I’ve found a problem where I have 2 methods, both annotated @Transactional:

package temp;

import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional;

public class OuterTestService {
    @Autowired
    private InnerTestService innerTestService;

    @Transactional
    public void outerMethod() {
        try {
            innerTestService.innerTestMethod();
        } catch (RuntimeException e) {
            // some code here
        }
    }
}

and

package temp;

import org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional;

public class InnerTestService {

    @Transactional
    public void innerTestMethod() throws RuntimeException {
        throw new RuntimeException();
    }
}

When I invoke OuterTestService#outerMethod(), I get an exception

org.springframework.transaction.UnexpectedRollbackException: Transaction rolled back because it has been marked as rollback-only

As there is only one transaction (no nested transactions), the whole outerTestMethod()‘s transaction is marked as rollback-only.

I’ve found that I can easily overcome this using noRollbackFor:

package cz.csas.pdb.be.service.tempdelete;

import org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional;

public class InnerTestService {

    @Transactional(noRollbackFor = RuntimeException.class)
    public void innerTestMethod() throws RuntimeException {
        throw new RuntimeException();
    }
}

But this has to be explicitly used on every method. Because this error is not raised during tests (which are rollbacked), this is not acceptable.

My question — is there a way to automatically (eg. not explicitly for every method) set that transactions are rolled back only when an exception is raised from method which started the transaction (in this case, the outerTestMethod())?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T17:33:08+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 5:33 pm

    Create another annotation, e.g. @NoRollbackTransactional, something like:

    @Transactional(noRollbackFor = RuntimeException.class)
    public @interface NoRollbackTransactional {
    }
    

    And use this on your methods. On the other hand I agree with Donal’s comment, you should revise your transaction scopes, imho it is generally not a good idea to call @Transactional from another @Transactional.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.