Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4233176
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T02:11:15+00:00 2026-05-21T02:11:15+00:00

I’m using .net 3.5 and vb.net. I know little about the inner working of

  • 0

I’m using .net 3.5 and vb.net. I know little about the inner working of each encryption mentioned below. I just use classes provided in .net class library.

I have a piece of information that have been encrypted with TripleDes, then Rijndael and finally RC2 algorithms. And all KEYs and IVs of those algorithms have been encrypted with RSA using 1024 keysize respectively.

Is that consider safe for now and for long term?

Because I heard that RSA encryption can be considered safe only for certain years. For example, in this article 768-bit RSA cracked, 1024-bit safe (for now)

Should I increase the RSA keysize to 2048 or more?

UPDATE:

The safe here means for long term and for very important secret

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T02:11:16+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 2:11 am

    Here is a list for how long keys for different encryption algorithms should be: http://www.keylength.com. The numbers listed on this site are regarded as the standard. When in doubt, check there. The Ecrypt II method is the most recent publication. You can find a PDF here: http://www.ecrypt.eu.org/documents/D.SPA.13.pdf. It makes for an interesting read and seems fairly accessible even if you don’t know much about cryptography (although I can’t be sure, since I work in the field).

    As for encrypting your original data multiple times with different algorithms: this is of no use, as long as you use an encryption algorithm that is strong. My suggestion would be to use the de-facto standard AES (= Rijndael).

    As for your symmetic key lenght, if you stick with AES, any of the three options (128, 192 or 256-bit) is fine. In fact, there are certain attacks on 256-bit AES that don’t work on the 128-bit version (due to key scheduling). Anyway, none of the published attacks on AES are of any practical use so far, so pick whatever you want.

    If you want to be very sure your key won’t be decrypted, yes, use RSA-2048. Btw, as you can see in this table: http://www.keylength.com/en/3/, AES-128 is equal in strength to RSA-3248.

    [Edit] One question though: why are you encrypting your keys? You effectively will have to store a 2048-bit RSA key in a secure location to be able to decrypt your 128-bit AES key. I don’t see the point. You might as well store the 128-bit key somewhere secure and be done with it. Or are you using multiple RSA keys to establish a symmetric key?

    Also, IVs are supposed to be public, no use in hiding/encrypting them, that effectively makes them a 2nd key. You already have a key. So don’t bother encrypting them.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
I'm new to using the Perl treebuilder module for HTML parsing and can't figure
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I'm using v2.0 of ClassTextile.php, with the following call: $testimonial_text = $textile->TextileRestricted($_POST['testimonial']); ... and
I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.