Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6812281
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T20:25:49+00:00 2026-05-26T20:25:49+00:00

I’m using Resharper 6 and ASP.NET Web Methods and have an irritating warning in

  • 0

I’m using Resharper 6 and ASP.NET Web Methods and have an irritating warning in my Javascript files:

"Use of implicitly declared global variable 'X'"

The reason is that the web method is created in Javascript as:

new X.example().webMethod(arg1, arg2, successCallback, failureCallback);

And X…is implicitly defined. I’m wondering if there is a solution to explicitly define this? It’s defined in some auto-generated JS file, created by the ASP.NET web method framework stuff.

My question is: how do I get rid of the error for this situation, without getting rid of it for legitimately wrong situations?

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T20:25:49+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 8:25 pm

    When using symbols (functions, constants, global variables) defined in other JavaScript files, I pass them to the current file’s “scoping function” (top-level, usually anonymous, function that prevents global namespace pollution) as parameters:

    multiple containers

    As you can see from the screenshot, ReSharper (6.0.2202.688) is happy with jQuery, ContainerA and ContainerB even though they are not defined anywhere in the current file. The comment in line 1 is only there for JSLint (no errors).

    This technique assumes that all the other JavaScript files follow the JavaScript best practice of minimally polluting the global namespace by defining a single top-level object that contains all the exported (public) symbols (i.e. jQuery is the only global object for jQuery library and its plugins, ContainerA is the only global object for LibraryA, ContainerB is the only global object for LibraryB, etc).

    Because you clearly don’t have control over ASP.NET Web Methods generating constructor functions into global namespace, in your case you have to resort to the ultimate container, window:

    window as a container

    This is a slight variation on the technique suggested by @sethobrien in his comment. An important (IMHO) advantage is that you’re not hard-coding window.X into your code. Instead, your code is instantiating classes from the aspNet container (that at the moment happens to be a synonym for window, but that might change in the future). Also, having aspNet.X in the code declares your intention more clearly for people who will read your code in the future. Finally, local variables can be shortened by JavaScript minimizers yielding slightly smaller file transmitted to client browsers.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have thousands of HTML files to process using Groovy/Java and I need to
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I have a bunch of posts stored in text files formatted in yaml/textile (from
I'm new to using the Perl treebuilder module for HTML parsing and can't figure
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
I used javascript for loading a picture on my website depending on which small

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.