Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 775441
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T19:17:22+00:00 2026-05-14T19:17:22+00:00

I’m using Rhino.Mocks for testing the system. I’m going to check the order of

  • 0

I’m using Rhino.Mocks for testing the system.

I’m going to check the order of calling .LoadConfig and .Backup methods. I need .LoadConfig to be the first.

Currently the code is like this:

var module1 = mocks.Stub<IBackupModule>();
var module2 = mocks.Stub<IBackupModule>();

module1.Expect(x => x.Name).Return("test");
module2.Expect(x => x.Name).Return("test2");

using (mocks.Ordered())
{
  module1.Expect(x => x.LoadConfig(null));
  module2.Expect(x => x.LoadConfig(null));

  module1.Expect(x => x.Backup());
  module2.Expect(x => x.Backup());
}
mocks.ReplayAll();

The problem is, that there’s also a call to .Name property, and i’m not interesting when it’ll be called: before .LoadConfig or after the .Backup – it just doesn’t matter.

And when I run this I’m getting Exception: Unordered method call! The expected call is: 'Ordered: { IConfigLoader.LoadConfig(null); }' but was: 'IIdentification.get_Name();'

Is there a way to deal with this?

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T19:17:23+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 7:17 pm

    According to this old CodeProject article, you can “nest” your Order() and Unordered() calls. Maybe that will get you what you’re looking for.

    Is the “Name” property called so many times that you don’t want to set it up as part of your ordered test?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.