Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 573311
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T13:42:38+00:00 2026-05-13T13:42:38+00:00

I’m using texture-based DOT3 lighting to achieve bump mapping on older iPhones, and I’m

  • 0

I’m using texture-based DOT3 lighting to achieve bump mapping on older iPhones, and I’m wondering if there’s a sneaky way to make it look correct even when the viewpoint changes.

With “real” lighting, normals get transformed by the inverse model-view matrix. With texture-based DOT3 lighting, there’s no transform.

With shader-based bump mapping, the normal map is in tangent space. With DOT3 lighting, the normal map needs to be in eye space. This is okay only if you have a fixed viewpoint, or if your geometry happens to be a flat plane.

Should I just accept this as another limitation of DOT3 lighting? Since it can’t handle specular either, I’m starting to question how useful it really is.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T13:42:38+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 1:42 pm

    Your normal map isn’t required to be in any particular space, as long as the light vector is in the same coordinate space. For DOT3 lighting on fixed-function hardware, it’s probably best to keep a normal map in object space, rather than eye space. From here, you just need to make sure that when you render each object, you apply the appropriate transformation to move your directional light vector from world space to object space.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.