Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 762987
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T16:29:15+00:00 2026-05-14T16:29:15+00:00

I’m using the TPL ( Task Parallel Library ) in .NET 4.0. I want

  • 0

I’m using the TPL (Task Parallel Library) in .NET 4.0. I want to centralize the handling logic of all unhandled exceptions by using the Thread.GetDomain().UnhandledException event. However, in my application, the event is never fired for threads started with TPL code, e.g. Task.Factory.StartNew(...). The event is indeed fired if I use something like new Thread(threadStart).Start().

This MSDN article suggests to use Task.Wait() to catch the AggregateException when working with TPL, but that is not what I want because this mechanism is not “centralized” enough.

Does anyone experience same problem at all or is it just me? Do you have any solution for this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T16:29:16+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 4:29 pm

    Seems like there’s no built-in way to handle this (and no answer to this question after almost 2 weeks). I already rolled out some custom code to take care of this. The solution description is pretty lengthy, so I’ve posted in my blog. Refer to this post if you’re interested.

    Update 5/7/2010: I’ve found a better way to do that, making use of task continuation. I create a class ThreadFactory that exposes the Error event which can be subscribed by a top-level handler and provides methods to start a task attached with proper continuation.
    The code is posted here.

    Update 4/18/2011: Post code from the blog post as per Nifle’s comment.

    internal class ThreadFactory
    {
        public delegate void TaskError(Task task, Exception error);
    
        public static readonly ThreadFactory Instance = new ThreadFactory();
    
        private ThreadFactory() {}
    
        public event TaskError Error;
    
        public void InvokeError(Task task, Exception error)
        {
            TaskError handler = Error;
            if (handler != null) handler(task, error);
        }
    
        public void Start(Action action)
        {
            var task = new Task(action);
            Start(task);
        }
    
        public void Start(Action action, TaskCreationOptions options)
        {
            var task = new Task(action, options);
            Start(task);
        }
    
        private void Start(Task task)
        {
            task.ContinueWith(t => InvokeError(t, t.Exception.InnerException),
                                TaskContinuationOptions.OnlyOnFaulted |
                                TaskContinuationOptions.ExecuteSynchronously);
            task.Start();
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 481k
  • Answers 481k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Have you considered using getmxrr() to get the mx records… May 16, 2026 at 6:35 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer To prevent the user from changing the text in the… May 16, 2026 at 6:35 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer try echo -e "${message}\n${changed}" | /usr/bin/php -q /home/chad/www/mantis.localhost/scripts/checkin.php where -e… May 16, 2026 at 6:35 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.