Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7869041
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T01:11:19+00:00 2026-06-03T01:11:19+00:00

I’m using the Unit Of Work Pattern with my data layer. public interface IUnitOfWork{

  • 0

I’m using the Unit Of Work Pattern with my data layer.

public interface IUnitOfWork{
    IRepository<Class1> Class1s {get;}
    IRepository<Class2> Class2s {get;}
    ...
}

public interface IRepository<T> where T:class{
    IQueryable<T> GetAll();
}

This is working as expected with my codebase; however, I’m having issues testing this
in my service layer.

public class SomeService{
    private readonly IUnitOfWork uow;
    public SomeService(IUnitOfWork u){
        uow = u;
    }

    public IEnumerable<ViewModel1> GetViewModel(){
        var result1 = uow.Class1s.GetAll();
        var result2 = uow.Class2s.GetAll();
        var query = from r1 in result1
                    from r2 in result2
                       where r1.key == r2.key
                       select new ViewModel1{...};
        return result;
    }
}

(The test) using Moq

[Test]
public void TestMethod(){
    var uow = new Mock<IUnitOfWork>();
    uow.Setup(u => u.Class1s.GetAll()).Returns(new []{ new Class1{...}}.AsQueryable());
    uow.Setup(u => u.Class2s.GetAll()).Returns(new []{ new Class2{...}}.AsQueryable());
    var service = new SomeService(uow.Object);
    var result = service.GetViewModel();
    Assert.AreEqual(1,result.Count());
}

The test is throwing an exception saying that result1 (and result2) are null. I realized this was because I’m not directly instantiating the properties. But I was wondering if there was a way to not have to also mock the properties inside of the mock. If not with Moq then maybe some other mocking framework?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T01:11:20+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 1:11 am

    No, Moq won’t help you here. You’ll have to set them manually (although you can mock them aswell):

    var class1Mock = new Mock<IRepository<Class1>>();
    var class2Mock = new Mock<IRepository<Class2>>();
    var uow = new Mock<IUnitOfWork>();
    uow.Setup(u => u.Class1).Returns(class1Mock.Object);
    uow.Setup(u => u.Class2).Returns(class2Mock.Object);
    

    Note that you’ll now have to do .Setup for GetAll on class1Mock and class2Mock:

    class1Mock
        .Setup(c => c.GetAll())
        .Returns(new [] { new Class1 {...} }.AsQueryable());
    

    If you want to have this kind of control over your mocks, there’s no shortcuts I’m afraid.

    Note: even though it wont help in your case (since you want direct control over mocks), AutoFixture with Moq is definitely worth checking out in similar scenarios.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm new to using the Perl treebuilder module for HTML parsing and can't figure
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I'm using v2.0 of ClassTextile.php, with the following call: $testimonial_text = $textile->TextileRestricted($_POST['testimonial']); ... and
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
We are using XSLT to translate a RIXML file to XML. Our RIXML contains
public static bool CheckLogin(string Username, string Password, bool AutoLogin) { bool LoginSuccessful; // Trim

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.