Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 199065
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T16:59:29+00:00 2026-05-11T16:59:29+00:00

I’m using UnitTest++ for unit testing C++ code. In my tests, there’s a group

  • 0

I’m using UnitTest++ for unit testing C++ code.

In my tests, there’s a group of tests I repeat several times. What I’d like is for a utility function to perform these tests. In short, I’d like to take this:

TEST( foo ) {
    Foo one;
    Foo two;

    // init one & two
    // lots of CHECK_CLOSE(one.bar, two.bar, 1e-5); in repeating cycles
}

TEST( bar ) {
    Foo one;
    Foo two;

    // init one & two
    // lots of CHECK_CLOSE(one.bar, two.bar, 1e-5); in repeating cycles
}

And use this:

void blah( const Foo& one, const Foo& two ) {
    // lots of CHECK_CLOSE(one.bar, two.bar, 1e-5);
}

TEST( foo ) {
    Foo one;
    Foo two;

    // init one & two
    blah(one, two);
}

TEST( bar ) {
    Foo one;
    Foo two;

    // init one & two
    blah(one, two);
}

This doesn’t work due to UnitTest++’s macro manipulations. What is the best way to approach this problem?

edit: A couple of thoughts which I can’t check out right now.

  1. If I use a fixture, with the utility function in the struct, will I be able to call UnitTest++ macros from within this function?
  2. I can write a macro to perform the common tests. I don’t really like this, but at least I’ll stary dry…
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T16:59:29+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 4:59 pm

    Write a macro to do it. Don’t let the “macros are evil” mantra hide this fact from you: Macros are designed to generate repetitive code.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 114k
  • Answers 114k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You overlooked this paragraph in the 4. part of the… May 11, 2026 at 10:16 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It's important to write each test in a way that… May 11, 2026 at 10:16 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Your comments indicate that you're working with a custom control.… May 11, 2026 at 10:16 pm

Related Questions

I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is
Is it possible to replace javascript w/ HTML if JavaScript is not enabled on

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.