Question

I’m very noob when it comes to ASP.NET MVC.

I’m looking at the starter example from the ASP.NET MVC add-in.

I see something like this was automatically generated:

[AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)]
public ActionResult Edit(int id, FormCollection collection)
{
    try
    {
        // TODO: Add update logic here
        return RedirectToAction("Index");
    }
    catch
    {
        return View();
    }
}

I find this stinks because I want to use the Entity Framework where entity state will be conserved. I would like something similar to:

[AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)]
public ActionResult Edit(Person person)
{
    try
    {
        // TODO: Add update logic here
        return RedirectToAction("Index");
    }
    catch
    {
        return View();
    }
}

Notice I took out FormCollection and replaced it with the Person class.
– I would like this to avoid magic strings.
– Conserve entity states.
– More explicit.

Is this even possible?

/confused with MVC

Answer 1

Yes, this is possible! The elements of your form will need to have the same name as the properties of the model that you’re trying to represent. This process is referred to as Binding, and you can discover more if you look at the ModelBinder object.

For more infos, take a look at this question: ASP.NET MVC example of editing multiple child records.