Question

I’m wondering if the following code has any gotcha’s that I’m not aware of when running on a webserver. Reading through the excellent series http://reedcopsey.com/series/parallelism-in-net4/ I am unable to find anything that relates specifically to my question, same with the msdn, so I thought I’d bring it here.

Example call:

public ActionResult Index() {
    ViewBag.Message = "Welcome to ASP.NET MVC!";

    Task.Factory.StartNew(() => {
        //This is some long completing task that I don't care about
        //Say logging to the database or updating certain information
        System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(10000);
    });

    return View();
}

Answer 1

ASP.Net supports asynchronous pages, see Asynchronous Pages in ASP.NET, but is a complicated programming model and does not bind at all with MVC. That being said, launching asynchronous tasks from a synchronous requests handler works up to a point:

• if the rate at which requests add new tasks exceeds the average rate of processing your process will crash eventually. The Tasks take up live memory and eventually they will fill up the in memory queues where they’re stored and your will start getting failures to submit.
• .Net Taks are inherently unreliable as they lack a persistent storage, so all tasks that are submitted async must be threaded as ‘abandonware’, ie. if they never complete there is no loss to the application nor to the user making the request. If the task is important, then it must be submitted through a reliable mechanism that guarantees execution in the presence of failures, like the one presented in Asynchronous procedure execution.