Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I’m wondering if these two expressions are equivalent, because if they are, it would make this much easier.
$('div', this).filter(':not(.trigger)')...
$('div:not([class*=trigger])', this)...
(this providing a context under which to look for the specified div)
They’re not essentially the same. The second also filters out all div’s which have a class which contains “trigger” in the name, thus also e.g. “anothertrigger” and “triggerfoo”.
You can also use
which is imho much clearer.