Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 763571
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T16:35:01+00:00 2026-05-14T16:35:01+00:00

I’m wondering if variable length lookbehind assertions are supported in JavaScript’s RegExp engine? For

  • 0

I’m wondering if variable length lookbehind assertions are supported in JavaScript’s RegExp engine?

For example, I’m trying to match the string “variable length” in the string “[a lot of whitespaces and/or tabs]variable length lookbehind“, and I have something like this but it does not go well in various RegExp testers:

^(?<=[ \t]+).+(?= lookbehind)

If it’s an illegal pattern, what would be a good workaround to it? Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T16:35:02+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 4:35 pm

    Javascript doesn’t have look-behind at all. Steven Levithan has written up a few says to sort of mimic it, which may be helpful.

    I don’t quite understand your example, because it seems as though this would fit the bill:

    /^\s+(.+)lookbehind$/
    

    …which matches one or more whitespace chars followed by one or more of any character (in a capture group) followed by the word “lookbehind”. Used like this:

    var str = "        variable length lookbehind";
    var match = /^\s+(.+)lookbehind$/.exec(str);
    

    yields this array:

    match[0]: |        variable length lookbehind|
    match[1]: |variable length|
    

    In Javascript, the first entry in the array is the entire matched string, and the subsequent entries are the capture groups.

    But you clearly have a good grasp of regex, so I’m not sure that’s what you’re looking for…

    Something to be aware of in this general area is that a number of implementations of RegExp engines in Javascript don’t quite handle \s correctly (they miss out matching some whitespace chars above the ASCII range); see the S_REGEXP_WHITESPACE_CHARACTER_CLASS_BUGGY test here.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 450k
  • Answers 450k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It's not the cleanest solution in the world, but you… May 15, 2026 at 8:31 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You are dividing integers. That always results in an integer.… May 15, 2026 at 8:31 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Here is a rather naive way to do it in… May 15, 2026 at 8:31 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.