Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3218986
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T15:35:31+00:00 2026-05-17T15:35:31+00:00

I’m working on a feature request for a .NET test data builder. I need

  • 0

I’m working on a feature request for a .NET test data builder. I need to be able to instantiate classes that only have private parameterless constructors.

For instance, I might need to instantiate the following class:

public class MyClass()
{
    private MyClass(){}
}

For most other classes I use the following code:

(T)Activator.CreateInstance(typeof(T), true)

But for classes that only have a private parameterless constructor I use the following:

(T)FormatterServices.GetUninitializedObject(typeof(T))

Unfortunately, I also have the requirement that this work in Silverlight and unfortunately Silverlight doesn’t currently contain System.Runtime.Serialization.FormatterServices.

Does anyone know of anything in the Silverlight implementation that would allow me to get around this? Failing that, does anyone know how I might implement my own version of this method?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T15:35:32+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 3:35 pm

    It turns out, that the answer was right in front of me.

    If you have a class defined as follows:

    public class MyClass
    {
        private MyClass(){}
    }
    

    you can instantiate it using the following code which I mentioned in my question:

    (T)Activator.CreateInstance(typeof(T), true)
    

    The additional parameter of true, creates an instance using the type’s default constructor.

    So it turns out, I didn’t even need to use FormatterServices.GetUninitializedObject in the first place.

    However, I’d like to thank Jon Skeet for his answer because it helped me to question my design and dig a bit deeper into Activator.CreateInstance and increase my understanding of class instantiation a little.

    For now, my solution is remove the use of FormatterServices and just allow an exception to be thrown if something goes wrong with the type creation.

    Currently, from what I can tell, using (T)Activator.CreateInstance(typeof(T), true) I should be able to construct most classes I’ve come across except for the following:

    public MyClass()
    {
        int a;
        private MyClass(int a)
        {
            this.a = a;
        }
    }
    

    However, it turns out there is a way suggested here to be able to instantiate this class:

    int argA = 100; 
    Type type = typeof(MyClass);
    
    ConstructorInfo c = type.GetConstructor(BindingFlags.NonPublic 
    | BindingFlags.Instance, null, new Type[] { typeof(int) }, null);
    
    MyClass o = (MyClass)c.Invoke(new Object[] { argA });
    

    But after thinking about what Jon said, I don’t think this will be of much use to anyone using the test data builder I’m enhancing. If someone’s gone to that much trouble to prevent a class from being instantiated, then perhaps it shouldn’t be able to be constructed other than by the means provided by the class designer.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.