Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6767807
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T14:59:43+00:00 2026-05-26T14:59:43+00:00

Im working on a legacy database, that cant be changed. I have a table

  • 0

Im working on a legacy database, that cant be changed.
I have a table (Table1) with a many-to-one relationship with another table (Table2) which has a composite key.
If everything was strait forward the mapping for table1 could look like this:

<class name="Table1" table="Table1">
  <id name="Id" column="I_ID"></id>
  <many-to-one name="Table2" class="Table2">
    <column name="I_TABLE2_ID1"></column>
    <column name="I_TABLE2_ID2"></column>
  </many-to-one>
</class>

My problem is that I dont have no I_TABLE2_ID2 column in Table1.
So I would like to use a default value instead. Is there any way to accomplish this in the mapping file?

EDIT1:
The following mapping seem to work:

<class name="Table1" table="Table1">
  <id name="Id" column="I_ID"></id>
  <property name="Table2Id1" column="I_TABLE2_ID1"></property>
  <bag name="Table2" where="I_ID2 = 12">
    <key column="I_ID1" property-ref="Table2Id1"></key>
    <one-to-many class="Table2"/>
  </bag>
</class>

Also I had to change the type of the Table2 property to an IList, but guess I could use a private property to make the entity look better…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T14:59:44+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 2:59 pm

    Maybe you should specify this relationship as a one-to-many instead and specify a where clause on the collection.

    http://www.nhforge.org/doc/nh/en/index.html#collections-mapping

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm working on a legacy database that is complete non-sense. I have a table
I am working with a legacy database that cannot have its structure changed (at
I'm working on a legacy database table that has a phone no. field but
I am working with a legacy database that has a table to store up
I am working with a legacy database schema that looks like this: product_table table
I have a legacy database which can't be changed because it's hooked up to
I have a legacy database that I am working with a basic column layout
I have a 'legacy' DB2 database that has many other applications and users. Trying
I'm working with a legacy SQL Server database which has a core table with
I have a legacy database that I'm working on getting ActiveRecord to work with.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.