Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6881831
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T05:10:41+00:00 2026-05-27T05:10:41+00:00

I’m working on a personal project for timekeeping on various projects, but I’m not

  • 0

I’m working on a personal project for timekeeping on various projects, but I’m not sure of the best way to structure my database.

A simplified breakdown of the structure is as follows:

  • Each client can have multiple reports.
  • Each report can have multiple line items.
  • Each line item can have multiple time records.

There will ultimately be more relationships, but that’s the basis of the application. As you can see, each item is related to the item beneath it in a one-to-many relationship.

My question is, should I relate each table to each “parent” table above it? Something like this:

clients
    id

reports
    id
    client_id

line_items
    id
    report_id
    client_id

time_records
    id
    report_id
    line_item_id
    client_id

And as it cascaded down, there would be more and more foreign keys added to each new table.

My initial reaction is that this is not the correct way to do it, but I would love to get some second(and third!) opinions.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T05:10:42+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 5:10 am

    The advantage of the way you’re doing it is that you could check all time records for, say, a specific client id without needing a join. But really, it isn’t necessary. All you need is to store a reference back up one “level” so to speak. Here are some examples from the “client” perspective:

    To get a specific client’s reports: (simple; same as current schema you suggest)

    SELECT * FROM `reports`
        WHERE `client_id` = ?;
    

    To get a specific client’s line items: (new schema; don’t need “client_id” in table)

    SELECT `line_items`.* FROM `line_items`
        JOIN `reports` ON `reports`.`id` = `line_items`.`id`
        JOIN `clients` ON `clients`.`id` = `reports`.`client_id`
        WHERE `clients`.`id` = ?;
    

    To get a specific client’s time entries: (new schema; don’t need “client_id” or “report_id” in table)

    SELECT `time_records`.* FROM `time_records`
        JOIN `line_items` ON `line_items`.`id` = `time_records`.`line_item_id`
        JOIN `reports` ON `reports`.`id` = `line_items`.`id`
        JOIN `clients` ON `clients`.`id` = `reports`.`client_id`
        WHERE `client_id` = ?;
    

    So, the revised schema would be:

    clients
        id
    
    reports
        id
        client_id
    
    line_items
        id
        report_id
    
    time_records
        id
        line_item_id
    

    EDIT:

    Additionally, I would consider using views to simplify the queries (I assume you’ll use them often), definitely creating indexes on the join columns, and utilizing foreign key references for normalization (InnoDB only).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need to clean up various Word 'smart' characters in user input, including but
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I need a function that will clean a strings' special characters. I do NOT
I want to construct a data frame in an Rcpp function, but when I
I have a reasonable size flat file database of text documents mostly saved in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.