Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 371925
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T14:09:41+00:00 2026-05-12T14:09:41+00:00

I’m working on a some build scripts that I’d like to depend on only

  • 0

I’m working on a some build scripts that I’d like to depend on only standardized features.
I need to sort some files by version. Say the files are bar-1.{0,2,3} bar-11.{0,2,3}.

By default, ls gives me:

bar-1_0
bar-11_0
bar-11_2
bar-11_3
bar-1_2
bar-1_3

Getting what I want is easy using ‘ls -v’:

bar-1_0
bar-1_2
bar-1_3
bar-11_0
bar-11_2
bar-11_3

The problem is that ‘ls -v’ is not standard. Standard sort also seems to lack the option I want, though I could be looking at old versions of the specs.

Can anyone suggest a portable way to achieve this effect short of writing my own sort routine?

Thanks,
Rhys

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T14:09:41+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 2:09 pm

    sort -n -t- -k2 seems to do what you want. -n gives you numeric (i.e. not alphabetic) sort; -t- sets the field separator to -, and -k2 selects the second field, i.e. the version number.

    My sort, on Ubuntu, even does the part with the underscore correctly, but I’m not sure if that is standard. To be sure, you could sort by the minor version first, then by major version.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.