Home/ Questions/Q 259715
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-11T22:17:14+00:00

I’m working on a Web service in Django, and I need to model a

  • 0

I’m working on a Web service in Django, and I need to model a very specific, complex relationship which I just can’t be able to solve.

Imagine three general models, let’s call them Site, Category and Item. Each Site contains one or several Categories, but it can relate to them in one of two possible ways: one are “common” categories, which are in a many-to-many relationship: they are predefined, and each Site can relate to zero or more of the Categories, and vice versa. The other type of categories are individually defined for each site, and one such category “belongs” only to that site and none other; i.e. they are in a many-to-one relationship, as each Site may have a number of those Categories.

Internally, those two type of Categories are completely identical, they only differ in the way they are related to the Sites. It could, however, separate them in two different models (with a common parent model probably), but that solves only half of my problem: the Item model is in a many-to-one relationship with the Categories, i.e. each Item belongs to only one Category, and ideally it shouldn’t care how it is related to a Site.

Another solution would be to allow the two separate types of Site-Category relations to coexist (i.e. to have both a ForeignKey and a ManyToMany field on the same Category model), but this solution feels like opening a whole other can of worms.

Does anyone have an idea if there is a third, better solution to this dead end?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    Why not just have both types of category in one model, so you just have 3 models?

    Site

Category
  Sites = models.ManyToManyField(Site)
  IsCommon =   models.BooleanField()

Item
  Category = models.ForeignKey(Category)

    You say “Internally, those two type of Categories are completely identical”. So in sounds like this is possible. Note it is perfectly valid for a ManyToManyField to have only one value, so you don’t need “ForeignKey and a ManyToMany field on the same Category model” which just sounds like a hassle. Just put only one value in the ManyToMany field

    • 0