Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 878975
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T11:51:13+00:00 2026-05-15T11:51:13+00:00

I’m working on an XSD. I’d like to have a container element (complex type)

  • 0

I’m working on an XSD. I’d like to have a container element (complex type) which contains any element whose base type is component.

One approach is…

<complexType name="Container">
    <sequence>
        <element name="Child" type="am:Component"></element>
    </sequence>
</complexType>

But the problem there is my components are called children. Lets assume I have 3 components, foo, bar, and baz. I’d like to be able to make a document that looked like…

<container>
    <foo fooTag="foo"/>
    <foo fooTag="foo"/>
    <baz bazTag="baz"/>
    <bar barTag="bar"/>
</container>

With the first approach I’d end up with…

<container>
    <child fooTag="foo"/>
    <child fooTag="foo"/>
    <child bazTag="baz"/>
    <child barTag="bar"/>
</container>

I could simply use an xs:any element but then I would lose my assertion that the child must be a component. Is there a way I can get what I want?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T11:51:14+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 11:51 am

    Ultimately you need to be able to say “Type Foo is represented by an element named foo” and that’s what the name attribute of xs:element does. You can’t do outright abstraction (as you could in a programming language), because types are just definitions and don’t have a specific element name until you give it one.

    You will need to list out every possible subtype in your sequence.

    <xs:sequence>
        <xs:choice>
             <xs:element name="type1" type="Type1" />
             <xs:element name="type2" type="Type2" />
             <xs:element name="type3" type="Type3" />
             <xs:element name="type4" type="Type4" />
        </xs:choice>
    </xs:sequence>
    

    You can also define your element names globally and refer to them like so, but ultimately you still need to indicate which child element names are valid inside your container element.

    <xs:sequence>
        <xs:any>
             <xs:element ref="type1" />
             <xs:element ref="type2" />
             <xs:element ref="type3" />
             <xs:element ref="type4" />
        </xs:any>
    </xs:sequence>
    

    And elsewhere:

    <xs:element name="type1" type="Type1" />
    <xs:element name="type2" type="Type2" />
    <xs:element name="type3" type="Type3" />
    <xs:element name="type4" type="Type4" />
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.