Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 729173
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T06:46:01+00:00 2026-05-14T06:46:01+00:00

I’m working on creating a SQL query that will pull records from a table

  • 0

I’m working on creating a SQL query that will pull records from a table based on the value of two aggregate functions. These aggregate functions are pulling data from the same table, but with different filter conditions. The problem that I run into is that the results of the SUMs are much larger than if I only include one SUM function. I know that I can create this query using temp tables, but I’m just wondering if there is an elegant solution that requires only a single query.

I’ve created a simplified version to demonstrate the issue. Here are the table structures:

EMPLOYEE TABLE

EMPID
1
2
3

ABSENCE TABLE

EMPID   DATE       HOURS_ABSENT
1       6/1/2009   3
1       9/1/2009   1
2       3/1/2010   2

And here is the query:

SELECT
    E.EMPID
    ,SUM(ATOTAL.HOURS_ABSENT) AS ABSENT_TOTAL
    ,SUM(AYEAR.HOURS_ABSENT) AS ABSENT_YEAR

FROM
    EMPLOYEE E

    INNER JOIN ABSENCE ATOTAL ON
        ATOTAL.EMPID = E.EMPID

    INNER JOIN ABSENCE AYEAR ON
        AYEAR.EMPID = E.EMPID

WHERE
    AYEAR.DATE > '1/1/2010'

GROUP BY
    E.EMPID

HAVING
    SUM(ATOTAL.HOURS_ABSENT) > 10
    OR SUM(AYEAR.HOURS_ABSENT) > 3

Any insight would be greatly appreciated.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T06:46:01+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 6:46 am
    SELECT
        E.EMPID
        ,SUM(ABSENCE.HOURS_ABSENT) AS ABSENT_TOTAL
        ,SUM(case when year(Date) = 2010 then ABSENCE.HOURS_ABSENT else 0 end) AS ABSENT_YEAR
    
    FROM
        EMPLOYEE E
    
        INNER JOIN ABSENCE ON
            ABSENCE.EMPID = E.EMPID
    
    GROUP BY
        E.EMPID
    
    HAVING
        SUM(ATOTAL.HOURS_ABSENT) > 10
        OR SUM(case when year(Date) = 2010 then ABSENCE.HOURS_ABSENT else 0 end) > 3
    

    edit:

    It’s not a big deal, but I hate repeating conditions so we could refactor like:

    Select * From
    (
        SELECT
            E.EMPID
            ,SUM(ABSENCE.HOURS_ABSENT) AS ABSENT_TOTAL
            ,SUM(case when year(Date) = 2010 then ABSENCE.HOURS_ABSENT else 0 end) AS ABSENT_YEAR
    
        FROM
            EMPLOYEE E
    
            INNER JOIN ABSENCE ON
                ABSENCE.EMPID = E.EMPID
    
        GROUP BY
            E.EMPID
        ) EmployeeAbsences
        Where ABSENT_TOTAL > 10 or ABSENT_YEAR > 3
    

    This way, if you change your case condition, it’s in one spot only.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 386k
  • Answers 386k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer java.util.SortedMap has the methods subMap(fromKey, toKey) and tailMap(fromKey). You can… May 14, 2026 at 11:38 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The maven ear plugin assumes that any WAR is a… May 14, 2026 at 11:38 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Biopython 1.54 was released today with a stable version of… May 14, 2026 at 11:38 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.