Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 921809
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T18:55:31+00:00 2026-05-15T18:55:31+00:00

I’m working with a persistent client/server protocol and I need to design a RESTful

  • 0

I’m working with a persistent client/server protocol and I need to design a RESTful gateway. I don’t have a lot of experience designing REST interfaces and I don’t understand how I should handle (in a RESTful way) the session IDs needed to maintain persistent connections on the server and how I should represent server state as resources.

I’m asking this because I don’t want to end-up with a RPC-ish result that looks “RESTful”.

Problem specific context: I want to improve the existing ZooKeeper REST gateway to support ephemeral nodes and watches. An ephemeral node exists while the client is connected to the server.

Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T18:55:31+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 6:55 pm

    The way in which I’ve done this in the past follows a “ticket” or “receipt” pattern. The REST service accepts requests for a resource (a report name, a znode, etc.) and returns a ticket. This ticket (usually a UUID or something similar) can be used to represent a session. Subsequent requests use this ticket to check on the status of their requests. To ensure proper expirey of tickets, one of two cases occurs; you can time out tickets or, upon receiving a result, the client must provide an ACK (acknowledgment) back to the service.

    ex.

    Request: GET /zookeeper/znode/ephemeral/foo
    Response: 1234-1234-1234-1234

    Request: GET /zookeeper/status/1234-1234-1234-1234
    Response: WORKING (or UNAVAILABLE or BLOCKED or NOTREADY or FAILED…)

    Request: GET /zookeeper/status/1234-1234-1234-1234
    Response: ACQUIRED (or AVAILABLE or OK or SUCCESS or some value(s)…)

    Request: GET /zookeeper/acknowledge/1234-1234-1234-1234
    Response: OK (or UNKNOWN TICKET, etc.)

    Interesting manageability messages:

    Request: GET /zookeeper/sessions (or /tickets)
    Response: [ 1234, 5668, … ]

    Request: GET /zookeeper/kill/
    Response: OK (or UNKNOWN or FAILED…)

    This has worked very, very well. This does mean, however the REST service is stateful which makes things like load balancing trickier. I’ve used a protocol that ensures a server ID is returned with each response and if the client receives a different server ID and an UNKNOWN ticket, you assume the service you were talking to has died and start over. This implies sticky load balancing (i.e. round-robin wouldn’t work here). The REST service needs to be multi-threaded to support performing these requests in parallel and provide access to a ticket database (usually in memory, sync’d hashtable data structure) as well as a session / ticket timeout thread.

    Hope this helps.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.