Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4029256
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T11:19:21+00:00 2026-05-20T11:19:21+00:00

I’m working with Azure Storage Tables and RIA services to create a, rather basic,

  • 0

I’m working with Azure Storage Tables and RIA services to create a, rather basic, Silverlight UI to access and manage some of the data.

Nothing too fancy: a data model with some annotations, and a DomainDataSource, make it all a breeze.

With one minor exception.

When I have a really, really large table, then loading it, at least when I’m doing this on the Development Fabric and even using the LoadSize parameter of the DomainDataSource, takes a LOT of time.

My guess is that the following thing happens:

  • The Silverlight client asks the RIA service for, say, 100 first rows of the table.
  • Since Azure Data Storage queries are extremely basic, the service retrieves all the rows from the data storage, and THEN performs Take(100) on that set.
  • Client gets the first 100 rows.

This is OK for conserving bandwidth, but it’s far from optimal when you consider that one must pay for processing power used by an Azure-based application.

Is there any way to optimise the RIA service queries? Is it even at all possible to use Take() and Skip() methods on Azure Storage Tables?

EDIT: I am using WCF RIA Services SP1 Beta, and have followed several tutorials on Silverlight with RIA services (which are all very very similar). Combining the two, I’m simply wondering if loading a large table into Silverlight can be improved by adding the LoadSize parameter. At the moment it seems to conserve bandwidth only (as the correct amount of rows is being sent to the Silverlight client), but the whole process still uses as much CPU time as it does for the whole table.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T11:19:22+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 11:19 am

    Have you tried RIA Services SP1 Beta? It includes TableDomainService that handles all the logic by managing entities in the specified Azure Storage account. Also, you can inspect traffic between your service and Azure Storage using Fiddler to find out what the problem is.

    References:

    • WCF RIA Services SP1 Beta announcement
    • Kyle McClellan’s blog – he is the person who developed TableDomainService. There are a lot of posts in his blog about this feature.

    EDIT:
    As Kyle McClellan mentioned below in the comment, this problem really exists in WCF RIA Services SP1 Beta.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.