Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 766441
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T17:02:56+00:00 2026-05-14T17:02:56+00:00

I’m writing a boot script for an ARM-Cortex M3 based device. If I compile

  • 0

I’m writing a boot script for an ARM-Cortex M3 based device. If I compile the assembler boot script and the C application code and then combine the object files and transfer them to my device everything works.

However, if I use ar to create an archive (libboot.a) and combine that archive with the C application there is a problem:

I’ve put the boot code in a section:

    .section    .boot, "ax"
    .global     _start

_start:
    .word       0x10000800  /* Initial stack pointer (FIXME!) */
    .word       start
    .word       nmi_handler
    .word       hard_fault_handler
    ... etc ...

I’ve found that ld strips this from the final binary (the section “boot” is not available). This is quite natural as there is no dependency on it that ld knows about, but it causes the device to not boot correctly.

So my question is: what is the best way to force this code to be included?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T17:02:57+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 5:02 pm

    Try adding something like:

    KEEP(*(.boot))
    

    in the ld linker script to tell the linker to keep the .boot section.

    However, I’m not sure if this is enough to cause ld to pull in any objects from the archive that are in the .boot section – it might not consider an object at all unless some symbol in that object is causing it to be pulled in. If this is a problem, specifying _start as the entry point (using -e _start on the ld command line or using ENTRY(_start) in the linker script) may be the solution.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 384k
  • Answers 384k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can use a complex type on the client side… May 14, 2026 at 11:04 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Just for records, looks like everything worked pretty well.... And… May 14, 2026 at 11:04 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Nokia says no: It is not possible to make changes… May 14, 2026 at 11:04 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.