Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6056635
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T08:23:56+00:00 2026-05-23T08:23:56+00:00

I’m writing a compiler for a special purpose language in LLVM. I want to

  • 0

I’m writing a compiler for a special purpose language in LLVM. I want to add bindings for a library that is already written in C++. My idea is to compile the library to LLVM bytecode (using clang -emit-llvm -S abc.c) and link it during compilation. This works well for code like

// lib.c
int f() {
    return 123;
}

But parts of the library are written like

// A.cc
class A {
    public:
        int f() { return 123; }
};

Which results in empty bytecode files. I know that I can fix this by separating the implementation:

// A.cc
class A {
    public:
        int f();
};

int A::f() {
    return 123;
}

But that would be a lot of tedious work. Is there any way to create useful bytecode from my library sources as they are? Or any other way to make the library available in my compiler?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T08:23:57+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 8:23 am

    You could see whether clang honours external linkage for explicit template instantiations. This might apply to non-templates, but otherwise you could ‘force it’ to work for templates.

    Simple synopsis:

    lib1.h

    template <typename T=int>
    struct ATemplate { T f() { return 123; } };
    

    add a file lib1_instantiate.cpp

    #include "lib1.h"
    template struct ATemplate<int>;
    template struct ATemplate<unsigned int>;
    template struct ATemplate<long>; // etc.
    

    This should instantiate the named templates with external linkage.

    If you’re stuck with a non-template class, and the trick above doesn’t work for that, you might wrap it like so:

    instantiate.cpp:

    namespace hidden_details
    {
        template <class libtype> struct instantiator : public libtype 
        // derives... just do something that requires a complete type (not a forward!)
        { };
    }
    
    template struct hidden_details::instantiator<A>;
    

    If you’re out of luck you’ll have to ‘use’ the inline members for them to get external linkage. A common trick is to use the address of these members (you won’t need to implement delegating stuff):

    instantiate.cpp:

    static void force_use_A()
    {
        void* unused = (void*) &A::f;
    }
    

    However

    1. the conversion to (void*) invokes undefined behaviour (you can’t compile that with -pedantic -Werror on gcc)
    2. for overloads you’ll have to specify ugly casts to disambiguate them

    HTH

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
I need a function that will clean a strings' special characters. I do NOT
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported
I am doing a simple coin flipping experiment for class that involves flipping a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.