Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8987697
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T21:51:26+00:00 2026-06-15T21:51:26+00:00

I’m writing a custom library that uses ServiceStack.Text internally. Other libraries that consume mine

  • 0

I’m writing a custom library that uses ServiceStack.Text internally. Other libraries that consume mine may also use ServiceStack.Text.

I want to change some JsConfig options (specifically date handling), but, like any good citizen, I don’t want my modifications of those values to cause side effects for my consumer.

Unfortunately JsConfig is a static class, so its settings are static, and would bleed to other consumers of ServiceStack in the same AppDomain I believe. That’s an undesired behavior.

Is there some way to scope my configuration changes to just my calls to the JsonSerializer?

Update

I do realize there is the JsConfig.Reset method, unfortunately if the caller has customized it already, that would be lost.

I could save values and restore them, but I would have to synchronize access to the serializer, which also kind of defeats the purpose.

Hopefully there is something simple I’m missing?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T21:51:27+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 9:51 pm

    This functionality was missing in ServiceStack.Text so I added a pull request for it.

    Basically now if you wanted to scope your config settings you can use the following syntax:

    using(var config = JsConfig.With(new Config { DateHandler = ... }))
    {
    }
    

    And the values will no longer be set once the using block goes out of scope, its ThreadStatic as well so won’t affect other threads.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I know there's a lot of other questions out there that deal with this
I'm trying to convert HTML to plain text. I get many &\#8217; &\#8220; etc.
I'm working with an upstream system that sometimes sends me text destined for HTML/XML
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I have a small JavaScript validation script that validates inputs based on Regex. I
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.