Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 295011
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T06:25:10+00:00 2026-05-12T06:25:10+00:00

I’m writing a job-scheduling app in Ruby for my work (primarily to move files

  • 0

I’m writing a job-scheduling app in Ruby for my work (primarily to move files using various protocol at a given frequency)

My main loop looks like this :

while true do
  # some code to launch the proper job
  sleep CONFIG["interval"]
end

It’s working like a charm, but I’m not really sure if it is safe enough as the application might run on a server with cpu-intensive software running.

Is there another way to do the same thing, or is sleep() safe enough in my case ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T06:25:10+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 6:25 am

    Using sleep is likely OK for quick and dirty things. But for things that need a bit more robustness or reliability I suggest that sleep is evil 🙂 The problem with sleeping is that the thread is (I’m assuming Windows here…) is truly asleep – the scheduler will not run the thread until some time after sleep interval has passed.

    During this time, the thread will not wake up for anything. This means it cannot be canceled, or wake up to process some kind of event. Of course, the process can be killed, but that doesn’t give the sleeping thread an opportunity to wake up and clean anything up.

    I’m not familiar with Ruby, but I assume it has some kind of facility for waiting on multiple things. If you can, I suggest that instead of using sleep, you waint on two things\

    1. A timer that wakes the thread periodically to do its work.
    2. An event that is set when he process needs to cancel or quite (trapping control-C for example).

    It would be even better if there is some kind of event that can be used to signal the need to do work. This would avoid polling on a timer. This generally leads to lower resource utilization and a more responsive system.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 271k
  • Answers 271k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Unless you really want to reinvent the wheel, I would… May 13, 2026 at 1:42 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The second level is not an array but an object.… May 13, 2026 at 1:42 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There's no sequence point with the << operator so the… May 13, 2026 at 1:42 pm

Related Questions

I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I'm trying to decode HTML entries from here NYTimes.com and I cannot figure out
I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
In order to apply a triggered animation to all ToolTip s in my app,

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.