Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8783667
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T20:52:46+00:00 2026-06-13T20:52:46+00:00

I’m writing a middleware which will perform a sequence of actions. After the sequence

  • 0

I’m writing a middleware which will perform a sequence of actions. After the sequence is done, I want the middleware to call next(). from this point on the middleware is redundant.
I’ve written the following code: (here the sequence of actions is mocked by a call to setTimeout):

function myMiddleware(req, res, next){

   console.info("inside myMiddleware");

   if (actionDone) {
       console.info("middleware redundant. ActionDone, calling next");
       next();
   }

   setTimeout(doneWaiting, 30000);

   function doneWaiting(){
      actionDone = true;
      next();
   }
}

This code will not work because if more than one request arrives before the action is done, setTimeout will be called again and again. I want setTimeout to be called only once, and only when it’s done I want to call next() on all the requests which arrived so far.

What is the best way to achieve this?

Thanks,
Li

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T20:52:47+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 8:52 pm

    If I understand correctly you want to perform a task and handle all requests once the task is finished? Until that happens they wait?

    So here’s non scalable way:

    var EventManager = new require("events").EventEmitter( );
    var actionDone = "start";
    
    function myMiddleware(req, res, next){
    
       console.info("inside myMiddleware");
       var handler = function( ) {
           console.info("middleware redundant. ActionDone, calling next");
           next();
       };
    
       if (actionDone === "finished" ) {
           handler( );
           return;
       }
    
       EventManager.once( "finished", handler );
    
       if (actionDone !== "working") {
           actionDone = "working";
           function doneWaiting(){
              actionDone = "finished";
              EventManager.trigger( "finished" );
           }
           setTimeout(doneWaiting, 30000);
       }
    }
    

    Obviously it is not scalable, because you cannot share EventManager object between machines. In order to do that between machines you would probably have to fire requests from the main server to every other server and handle the request similarly.

    WARNING: what you trying to do looks like a very very bad idea. After all requests should not depend on each other. This can easily lead to server crash.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have a text area in my form which accepts all possible characters from
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
I used javascript for loading a picture on my website depending on which small
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.