Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 293499
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T06:16:52+00:00 2026-05-12T06:16:52+00:00

I’m writing a plug-in for an application where I have a custom class that

  • 0

I’m writing a plug-in for an application where I have a custom class that attributes the native objects of the program. The API allows me to read and write keyed strings directly to and from the objects in the native file. So rather then reading and writing to private fields in the Get and Set accessors of each property I’m reading and writing these user strings to and from the native objects in the program.

The user accesses these properties through a PropertyGrid control. So far this is all working fine with simple properties except now I need to store a custom collection (FloorCollection) of a custom object type (Floor).

So I’ve setup a property using XmlSerializer. The GET accessor reads the user string from the native objects, and then the string is deserialized into an instance of FloorCollection. The SET accessor does the reverse by reading in an instance of a FloorCollection, and serializing it to the user string.

Here’s what my property looks like:

public FloorCollection Floors
{
    get 
    {
        string oldString = this.GetBaseObjUserString("CPFloors");
        if (oldString == null) return null;

        XmlSerializer serializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(FloorCollection));
        StringReader strReader = new StringReader(oldString);

        FloorCollection newCollection =                 
        (FloorCollection)serializer.Deserialize(strReader);
        return newCollection;
    }

    set 
    {
        FloorCollection newCol = value;

        if (newCol == null) return;

        //serializes new collection
        XmlSerializer serializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(FloorCollection));
        StringWriter sw = new StringWriter();

        serializer.Serialize(sw, newCol);

        string newString = sw.ToString();

        this.SetBaseObjUserString("CPFloors", newString);
    }
}

I can open this collection property through my PropertGrid in the default collection editor. However, the default collection editor only edits the collection at the reference provided by the GET accessor, rather then calling the SET accessor to save it back to the object. So I can edit the collection in the default editor, but when I close and reopen the editor the collection will not have changed because the SET accessor is never called to serialize the collection back to the user string in the native object.

Can I modify the default collection editor to call the set accessor of the property? If I setup a custom UITypeEditor for the property is there a way to have it save back to the property using the property set accessor? Or is there some other way to force code that is accessing the collection property to GET and SET the property by value rather then reference?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T06:16:52+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 6:16 am

    I don’t believe the XML Serializer will ever call the set accessor for a collection. Instead, it will just call the Add method of the collection instance it retrieves from the get accessor.

    I believe you’ll need to have your collection type override the Add and Remove methods and such to modify the collection, and then serialize the modified collection back into the user property.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 154k
  • Answers 154k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer LINQ to XML is mostly not schema-aware - it lets… May 12, 2026 at 10:32 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer well I am not sure how FF's IE tab works… May 12, 2026 at 10:32 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The dependencies are automatically managed through metadata included with features.… May 12, 2026 at 10:32 am

Related Questions

I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.