Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 212803
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T18:13:12+00:00 2026-05-11T18:13:12+00:00

I’m writing a program in C++ and for some reason I’m getting a segmentation

  • 0

I’m writing a program in C++ and for some reason I’m getting a segmentation error at the following line:

char* param= new char[200];

I’ve tried different variations and even tried putting before it

int* param= new int;//for no reason

and the same error occurs. What might I have done to cause this problem?

What could possibly cause a simple memory allocation like this to give problems.

I would include the rest of the program, but it’s over 1000 lines. But feel free to ask for more info.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T18:13:13+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 6:13 pm

    I’d say Neil’s on the right track – it’s probably something you trampled earlier on that’s only being caught there.

    Have you made sure that:

    1. All previous allocations succeeded.
    2. You’ve not written past the end or beginnings of any arrays (there’s a plethora of information and tools for bounds checking out there).

    [Edit] In response to your comment about having 4GB of RAM, suppose you code effectively does the following:

    unsigned int amountToAllocate = 0;
    amountToAllocate -= 1;
    
    int* someStorage = new int[amountToAllocate];
    
    someStorage[0] = 5;
    

    …because amountToAllocate is an unsigned int, it will wrap round to it’s maximum value (4294967295 if unsigned ints are 32 bit on your hardware). So you’d be trying to allocate 4294967295*4 bytes (again, assuming ints are 32 bit for you)… which is ~4*4GB and will fail and die a nasty death.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 117k
  • Answers 118k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Timer timer… May 11, 2026 at 10:50 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use GROUP_CONCAT SELECT GROUP_CONCAT(bar) FROM TABLE GROUP BY foo; May 11, 2026 at 10:50 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Your code doesn't work because the function is not returning… May 11, 2026 at 10:50 pm

Related Questions

I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.