I’m writing a real NumericUpDown/Spinner control as an exercise to learn custom control authoring. I’ve got most of the behavior that I’m looking for, including appropriate coercion. One of my tests has revealed a flaw, however.
My control has 3 dependency properties: Value, MaximumValue, and MinimumValue. I use coercion to ensure that Value remains between the min and max, inclusive. E.g.:
// In NumericUpDown.cs
public static readonly DependencyProperty ValueProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("Value", typeof(int), typeof(NumericUpDown),
new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(0, FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.BindsTwoWayByDefault | FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.Journal, HandleValueChanged, HandleCoerceValue));
[Localizability(LocalizationCategory.Text)]
public int Value
{
get { return (int)this.GetValue(ValueProperty); }
set { this.SetCurrentValue(ValueProperty, value); }
}
private static object HandleCoerceValue(DependencyObject d, object baseValue)
{
NumericUpDown o = (NumericUpDown)d;
var v = (int)baseValue;
if (v < o.MinimumValue) v = o.MinimumValue;
if (v > o.MaximumValue) v = o.MaximumValue;
return v;
}
My test is just to ensure that data binding works how I expect. I created a default wpf windows application and threw in the following xaml:
<Window x:Class="WpfApplication.MainWindow" x:Name="This"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:nud="clr-namespace:WpfCustomControlLibrary;assembly=WpfCustomControlLibrary"
Title="MainWindow" Height="350" Width="525">
<Grid>
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition />
<RowDefinition />
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<nud:NumericUpDown Value="{Binding ElementName=This, Path=NumberValue}"/>
<TextBox Grid.Row="1" Text="{Binding ElementName=This, Path=NumberValue, Mode=OneWay}" />
</Grid>
</Window>
with very simple codebehind:
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
public int NumberValue
{
get { return (int)GetValue(NumberValueProperty); }
set { SetCurrentValue(NumberValueProperty, value); }
}
// Using a DependencyProperty as the backing store for NumberValue. This enables animation, styling, binding, etc...
public static readonly DependencyProperty NumberValueProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("NumberValue", typeof(int), typeof(MainWindow), new UIPropertyMetadata(0));
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
}
(I’m omitting the xaml for the control’s presentation)
Now if I run this I see the value from the NumericUpDown reflected appropriately in the textbox, but if I type in a value that’s out of range the out of range value gets displayed in the test textbox while the NumericUpDown shows the correct value.
Is this how coerced values are supposed to act? It’s good that it’s coerced in the ui, but I expected the coerced value to run through the databinding as well.
Wow, that is surprising. When you set a value on a dependency property, binding expressions are updated before value coercion runs!
If you look at DependencyObject.SetValueCommon in Reflector, you can see the call to Expression.SetValue halfway through the method. The call to UpdateEffectiveValue that will invoke your CoerceValueCallback is at the very end, after the binding has already been updated.
You can see this on framework classes as well. From a new WPF application, add the following XAML:
and the following code:
If you drag the Slider and then click the button, you’ll get a message like “Value changed from 11 to -1; Slider changed from 11 to 10”.