Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4116158
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T22:40:24+00:00 2026-05-20T22:40:24+00:00

I’m writing a real-time operating system for a course in school. I’m having a

  • 0

I’m writing a real-time operating system for a course in school. I’m having a lot of problems getting the initial process’ context switch (the handover from OS to process) so I’ve simplified the problem to try and find out where I’m making a mistake.

In the following code, what I’m trying to accomplish is placing the test_func address on the stack pointer and then returning, thus loading that function’s address into the program counter. What’s happening is that the board is re-invoking the Arduino setup() method, which repeats the whole process.

void test_func(void)
{
    while(1 == 1){
    digitalWrite(13,HIGH);// to let me know everything has worked
    DEBUG("test_func");
    }
} 
//...
volatile void *programcounter;
//...
programcounter = (void *)(&test_func);
asm volatile(
"lds  r26, programcounter      \n\t" \
"lds  r27, programcounter+1    \n\t" \
"ld   r28, x+                  \n\t" \
"out  __SP_L__, r28            \n\t" \
"ld   r29, x+                  \n\t" \
"out  __SP_H__, r29            \n\t" \
"ret");

This was done following the examples from the FreeRTOS project -guide located here (pdf). I’m writing this in the Arduino IDE as a C file. Thank so much for any input you have.

EDIT:

Trying another, simpler example. I’m looking at the Bertos implementation: http://dev.bertos.org/wiki/ArduinoHowto . I’m starting out with a fresh sketch:

    #include <avr/interrupt.h>
    #include <avr/io.h>

    void test_func()
    {
      while(true){
            Serial.write("Testing ...");
            digitalWrite(13, HIGH);
      }
    }

    volatile void (*tempcounter)(void);
    volatile void (**programcounter)(void);

    void setup() {
      // put your setup code here, to run once:
      Serial.begin(9600);
      pinMode(13, OUTPUT);
      digitalWrite(13, LOW);

      tempcounter = (volatile void (*)())(&test_func);
      programcounter = &tempcounter;

      Serial.println("Setting up ...");

      asm volatile (
      "cli\n\t"\
    "lds  r24, programcounter      \n\t" \
    "lds  r25, programcounter+1    \n\t" \
    "movw  r26,r24\n\t"\
    "ld  r18,X+\n\t"\
    "ld  r19,X\n\t"\
    "out  __SP_L__,r18\n\t"\
    "out  __SP_H__,r19\n\t"\
    "sei\n\t"\
    "ret");
      Serial.println("This should never appear");
    }

    void loop() {
      // put your main code here, to run repeatedly: 
      Serial.println("looping");
    }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T22:40:25+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 10:40 pm

    According to clawson on the AVR Freaks Forum, the issue is a misunderstanding of how the ret works. I’ve got it working now; his implementation looks like:

    asm volatile ( 
    "cli\n\t"\ 
    "lds  r24, programcounter      \n\t" \ 
    "lds  r25, programcounter+1    \n\t" \ 
    "ldi  r18, 0x00\n\t" \ 
    "ldi  r19, 0x03\n\t" \ 
    "out  __SP_L__,r18\n\t"\ 
    "out  __SP_H__,r19\n\t"\ 
    "push r24\n\t"\ 
    "push r25\n\t"\ 
    "sei\n\t"\ 
    "ret\n\t");
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I have a bunch of posts stored in text files formatted in yaml/textile (from
I have this code: - (void)parser:(NSXMLParser *)parser foundCDATA:(NSData *)CDATABlock { NSString *someString = [[NSString
I am trying to loop through a bunch of documents I have to put
I'm making a simple page using Google Maps API 3. My first. One marker
I have some data like this: 1 2 3 4 5 9 2 6

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.