Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7654331
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T12:13:44+00:00 2026-05-31T12:13:44+00:00

I’m writing a Ruby gem using the {key: ‘value’} syntax for hashes throughout my

  • 0

I’m writing a Ruby gem using the {key: 'value'} syntax for hashes throughout my code. My tests all pass in 1.9.x, but I (understandably) get syntax error, unexpected ':', expecting ')' in 1.8.7.

Is there a best practice for supporting the 1.8.x? Do I need to rewrite the code using our old friend =>, or is there a better strategy?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T12:13:46+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 12:13 pm

    I think you’re out of luck, if you want to support 1.8 then you have to use =>. As usual, I will mention that you must use => in certain cases in 1.9:

    1. If the key is not a symbol. Remember that any object (symbols, strings, classes, floats, …) can be a key in a Ruby Hash.
    2. If you need a symbol that you’d quote: :'this.that'.
    3. If you use MongoDB for pretty much anything you’ll be using things like :$set => hash but $set: hash is a syntax error.

    Back to our regularly scheduled programming.

    Why do I say that you’re out of luck? The Hash literal syntaxes (both of them) are hard-wired in the parser and I don’t think you’re going to have much luck patching the parser from your gem. Ruby 1.8.7’s parse.y has this to say:

    assoc    : arg_value tASSOC arg_value
                 {
                     $$ = list_append(NEW_LIST($1), $3);
                 }
             ;
    

    and tASSOC is => so hash literals are hard-wired to use =>. 1.9.3’s says this:

    assoc    : arg_value tASSOC arg_value
                 {
                 /*%%%*/
                     $$ = list_append(NEW_LIST($1), $3);
                 /*%
                     $$ = dispatch2(assoc_new, $1, $3);
                 %*/
                 }
             | tLABEL arg_value
                 {
                 /*%%%*/
                     $$ = list_append(NEW_LIST(NEW_LIT(ID2SYM($1))), $2);
                 /*%
                     $$ = dispatch2(assoc_new, $1, $2);
                 %*/
                 }
             ;
    

    We have the fat-arrow syntax again (arg_value tASSOC arg_value) and the JavaScript style (tLABEL arg_value); AFAIK, tLABEL is also the source of the restrictions on what sorts of symbols (no :$set, no :'this.that', …) can be used with the JavaScript-style syntax. The current trunk parse.y matches 1.9.3 for Hash literals.

    So the Hash literal syntax is hard-wired into the parser and you’re stuck with fat arrows if you want to support 1.8.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
I have this code to decode numeric html entities to the UTF8 equivalent character.
I'm using v2.0 of ClassTextile.php, with the following call: $testimonial_text = $textile->TextileRestricted($_POST['testimonial']); ... and
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I have this code: - (void)parser:(NSXMLParser *)parser foundCDATA:(NSData *)CDATABlock { NSString *someString = [[NSString
We are using XSLT to translate a RIXML file to XML. Our RIXML contains

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.