Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9240955
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T08:16:38+00:00 2026-06-18T08:16:38+00:00

I’m writing a script in Python to ssh into a few computers (about ten)

  • 0

I’m writing a script in Python to ssh into a few computers (about ten) and have them start rendering 3d images from Blender. It works fine except the next computers’s renders won’t start until the previous ones are finished. Is there a way to start the commands and have them all run concurrently on their own machines?

what my code looks like:

import os
path = /home/me
comp1 = ['sneffels','1','2'] #computer name, start frame, end frame
comp2 = ['bierstadt','3','4']
comp3 = ['diente','5','6']

os.system("ssh igp@" + str(comp1[0]) + " blender -b "+ str(path) +" -s " + str(comp1[1]) + " -e " + str(comp1[2]) + " -a")

os.system("ssh igp@" + str(comp2[0]) + " blender -b "+ str(path) +" -s " + str(comp2[1]) + " -e " + str(comp2[2]) + " -a")

os.system("ssh igp@" + str(comp3[0]) + " blender -b "+ str(path) +" -s " + str(comp3[1]) + " -e " + str(comp3[2]) + " -a")
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T08:16:40+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 8:16 am

    The problem is that os.system doesn’t return until the program is done, and ssh isn’t done until the command you gave it is done.

    This is one of many reasons not to use os.system—as the documentation explicitly says:

    The subprocess module provides more powerful facilities for spawning new processes and retrieving their results; using that module is preferable to using this function. See the Replacing Older Functions with the subprocess Module section in the subprocess documentation for some helpful recipes.

    In subprocess, you can create a bunch of subprocesses, and then join them all after they’ve all been kicked off. For example:

    p1 = subprocess.Popen("ssh igp@" + str(comp1[0]) + " blender -b "+ str(path) +" -s " + str(comp1[1]) + " -e " + str(comp1[2]) + " -a", shell=True)
    p2 = subprocess.Popen("ssh igp@" + str(comp2[0]) + " blender -b "+ str(path) +" -s " + str(comp2[1]) + " -e " + str(comp2[2]) + " -a", shell=True)
    p3 = subprocess.Popen("ssh igp@" + str(comp3[0]) + " blender -b "+ str(path) +" -s " + str(comp3[1]) + " -e " + str(comp3[2]) + " -a", shell=True)
    p1.wait()
    p2.wait()
    p3.wait()
    

    That probably isn’t the best way to do this. Read the subprocess docs to understand why shell=True and passing a string is usually not as good as passing a list of parameters, other ways to manage your subprocesses, etc.. But meanwhile, this is probably the simplest change from what you already have.

    Another alternative is to not shell out to the ssh command in the first place, but instead use something like paramiko to spawn the remote processes from within Python.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I have a small JavaScript validation script that validates inputs based on Regex. I
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I have an autohotkey script which looks up a word in a bilingual dictionary
I don't have much knowledge about the IPv6 protocol, so sorry if the question
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I have a .ini file as follows: [playlist] numberofentries=2 File1=http://87.230.82.17:80 Title1=(#1 - 365/1400) Example
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
I am using JSon response to parse title,date content and thumbnail images and place

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.