Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8994157
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T23:21:45+00:00 2026-06-15T23:21:45+00:00

I’m writing a TCP server class that I want to be self-contained. That is,

  • 0

I’m writing a TCP server class that I want to be self-contained. That is, the applications that use this class need not worry about the internal worker threads. The TCP server class has a start() method and I want to be able to call the listener’s methods on the same thread that called start() (under normal use, the main thread). This is probably better explained with code:

public class ProblemExample {
    private Listener mListener;

    public ProblemExample() {
        mListener = new Listener() {
            @Override
            public void fireListener() {
                System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName());
            }
        };
    }

    public void start() {
        mListener.fireListener(); // "main" is printed
        new Thread(new Worker()).start();
    }

    public interface Listener {
        public void fireListener();
    }

    private class Worker implements Runnable {
        @Override
        public void run() {
            /* Assuming the listener is being used for status updates while
             * the thread is running, I'd like to fire the listener on the
             * same thread that called start(). Essentially, the thread that
             * starts the operation doesn't need to know or care about the
             * internal thread. */
            mListener.fireListener(); // "Thread-0" is printed
        }
    }
}

I’ve tried searching for this but I’m not really sure what to search for. The best I’ve found is that SwingWorker seems to do this, but I can’t find out how.

Can anyone shed some light?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T23:21:47+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 11:21 pm

    What you are asking for is theoretically impossible without explicit cooperation from the client thread (the one that called start()). Just stop to think about it: the main thread is always busy running some specific code, in some specific method. The complete call stack is dedicated to the current call. Now you would like to interrupt that and start executing listener code out of the blue.

    The way Swing achieves this is by running a main event loop in the Event Dispatch Thread. In this loop, you can imagine instances of Runnable being pulled off of a queue and their run methods called in turn. Only when one run method returns can the next one be called.

    This is what you need to design for your case as well, but I’m not sure whether you had something like that in mind. The only alternative is explicit support for listener methods being executed on a foreign thread.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I need a function that will clean a strings' special characters. I do NOT
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported
I am doing a simple coin flipping experiment for class that involves flipping a
I know there's a lot of other questions out there that deal with this
I'm not entirely sure how I managed to jack this up. http://pretty-senshi.com If you
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.