I’m writing an app that:
- absolutely relies on sending data to server via
Javascript - must not have
JQuerylibrary included in code.
(I don’t know if my code will be included in web pages that already have jquery lib, I do not know if there’s gonna be right version, I do not know if there is gonna be JQuery conflict and so… )
I must relay on native JS functionality XMLHttpRequest(ActiveX for older IE's) methods, which is simple but than I saw warning:
“Without jQuery, AJAX coding can be a bit tricky!
Writing regular AJAX code can be a bit tricky, because different
browsers have different syntax for AJAX implementation. This means
that you will have to write extra code to test for different browsers.
However, the jQuery team has taken care of this for us, so that we can
write AJAX functionality with only one single line of code.”
What is ‘tricky’ about that? What am I possible doing wrong? As far as I know
var xmlhttp;
if (window.XMLHttpRequest)
{// code for IE7+, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari
xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
}
else
{// code for IE6, IE5
xmlhttp = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP");
}
is only extra code for different browsers and my xmlhttp var should be from now on ready to do the job in IE5, IE6, IE7+, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari.
Is above cross-browser code adjustment all I should do or is there anything else I should take care about when using native XMLHttpRequest object?
That’s the only thing necessary for cross-browser support unless you need to support really old IEs (which apparently use a different ActiveXObject).
However, using e.g. jQuery provides a bunch of additional advantages:
Since you mention that you cannot use jQuery because your app will be embedded in another site that might conflict with it: You can avoid this by including jQuery and then using
$.noConflict(true)to restore both the old$andjQueryvariables. To use it in your code you then write it like this: