Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 120679
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T03:50:58+00:00 2026-05-11T03:50:58+00:00

I’m writing some code where the UI thread need to communicate with the background

  • 0

I’m writing some code where the UI thread need to communicate with the background thread doing network communication. The code works, but would it be considered thread safe?

I would feel a lot better if someone experienced could lead me on to the right path on this…

static Mutex^ mut_currentPage = gcnew Mutex; static array<unsigned char>^ m_currentPage;  property array<unsigned char>^ Write {     void set(array<unsigned char>^ value)      {         mut_currentPage->WaitOne();         m_currentPage = value;         mut_currentPage->ReleaseMutex();     } } 

This is .NET C++ code… 🙂

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T03:50:59+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 3:50 am

    It looks thread-safe, but you might want to think about exception handling; setting a field shouldn’t error (except perhaps ThreadAbortException), but if the code was more complex, you’d want to ensure you release the mutex upon exception.

    I’d also look at Monitor (‘lock’ in C#)

    One other thought: even if you lock the field access, an array is inherently mutable. Consider using string instead, since this is immutable?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have some data like this: 1 2 3 4 5 9 2 6
I have a bunch of posts stored in text files formatted in yaml/textile (from
I am trying to loop through a bunch of documents I have to put
I'm making a simple page using Google Maps API 3. My first. One marker

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.