Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 659615
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T23:03:52+00:00 2026-05-13T23:03:52+00:00

I’m writing system-level code for an embedded system without memory protection (on an ARM

  • 0

I’m writing system-level code for an embedded system without memory protection (on an ARM Cortex-M1, compiling with gcc 4.3) and need to read/write directly to a memory-mapped register. So far, my code looks like this:

#define UART0     0x4000C000
#define UART0CTL  (UART0 + 0x30)

volatile unsigned int *p;
p = UART0CTL;
*p &= ~1;

Is there any shorter way (shorter in code, I mean) that does not use a pointer? I looking for a way to write the actual assignment code as short as this (it would be okay if I had to use more #defines):

*(UART0CTL) &= ~1;

Anything I tried so far ended up with gcc complaining that it could not assign something to the lvalue…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T23:03:53+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 11:03 pm

    I’d like to be a nitpick: are we talking C or C++ ?

    If C, I defer to Chris’ answer willingly (and I’d like the C++ tag to be removed).

    If C++, I advise against the use of those nasty C-Casts and #define altogether.

    The idiomatic C++ way is to use a global variable:

    volatile unsigned int& UART0 = *((volatile unsigned int*)0x4000C000);
    volatile unsigned int& UART0CTL = *(&UART0 + 0x0C);
    

    I declare a typed global variable, which will obey scope rules (unlike macros).

    It can be used easily (no need to use *()) and is thus even shorter!

    UART0CTL &= ~1; // no need to dereference, it's already a reference
    

    If you want it to be pointer, then it would be:

    volatile unsigned int* const UART0 = 0x4000C000; // Note the const to prevent rebinding
    

    But what is the point of using a const pointer that cannot be null ? This is semantically why references were created for.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 431k
  • Answers 431k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Because m.put returns null (which indicates that there's no "previous"… May 15, 2026 at 2:11 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Is my assumption correct?. i.e. can I simply define the… May 15, 2026 at 2:11 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I think this has a few different solutions. If you… May 15, 2026 at 2:11 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.