Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 909557
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T16:53:53+00:00 2026-05-15T16:53:53+00:00

I’m writing testing code that will automatically iterate thru all Q_PROPERTY’s of widgets and

  • 0

I’m writing testing code that will automatically iterate thru all Q_PROPERTY’s of widgets and some properties are using types that are registered via qRegisterMetaType. If i want to read/write these into QVariant i need to use QVariant::UserType when storing them into variant. So far so good.

But when i want to test reads and writes of these properties, i need to also know their type. For stuff that are already standard qt types, i can do this via QVariant::type() but as i have alot of usertypes, how would this be accomplished ?

From the api of QVariant, i spotted this:

bool QVariant::canConvert ( Type t ) const

But i’m slightly doubtful if this will lead to wrong types in case of enums?

So, what would be the foolproof way to verify what type of usertype is stored in QVariant ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T16:53:54+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 4:53 pm

    For user defined types there is QVariant::userType(). It works like QVariant::type() but returns the type id integer of the user defined type whereas QVariant::type() always return QVariant::UserType.

    There is also QVariant::typeName() which returns the name of the type as a string.

    EDIT :

    It probably depends on how you set the QVariant. Directly using QVariant::QVariant(int type, const void * copy) is discouraged.

    Say I have three types like this :

    class MyFirstType
    { 
        public:
            MyFirstType();
            MyFirstType(const MyFirstType &other);
            ~MyFirstType();
    
            MyFirstType(const QString &content);
    
            QString content() const;
    
        private:
            QString m_content;
    };
    Q_DECLARE_METATYPE(MyFirstType);
    

    The third without Q_DECLARE_METATYPE

    I store them in QVariant :

     QString content = "Test";
    
     MyFirstType first(content);
    
     MySecondType second(content);
    
     MyThirdType third(content);
    
     QVariant firstVariant;
     firstVariant.setValue(first);
    
     QVariant secondVariant = QVariant::fromValue(second);
    
     int myType = qRegisterMetaType<MyThirdType>("MyThirdType");
    
     QVariant thirdVariant(myType, &third); // Here the type isn't checked against the data passed
    
     qDebug() << "typeName for first :" << firstVariant.typeName();
     qDebug() << "UserType :" << firstVariant.userType();
     qDebug() << "Type : " << firstVariant.type();
    
     [...]
    

    I get :

    typeName for first : MyFirstType 
    UserType : 256 
    Type :  QVariant::UserType 
    
    typeName for second : MySecondType 
    UserType : 257 
    Type :  QVariant::UserType 
    
    typeName for third : MyThirdType 
    UserType : 258 
    Type :  QVariant::UserType 
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.