Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8421605
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T03:11:39+00:00 2026-06-10T03:11:39+00:00

In a base clear case project that I have, the config spec handed to

  • 0

In a base clear case project that I have, the config spec handed to me reads like this:

element * CHECKEDOUT
element * .../PROJ_1.5.0/LATEST
element * .../main/LATEST -mkbranch PROJ_1.5.0
element * /main/LATEST

I read up a bit on config specs here at his guide:
http://www.philforhumanity.com/ClearCase_Support_17.html
It seems to me that in my config spec, the last line has no value. Because
element * /main/LATEST is already there on the second last line. Is my understanding correct?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T03:11:40+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 3:11 am

    That last line is a selection rule stopper: it is a rule which will always be selected if all the other fail.
    (That would be because there always is a branch named main — unless you renamed it, but that is rare –, and always at least a version 0 — placeholder — for each element added to source control in ClearCase)

    So it is important to have it.

    Suppose a directory isn’t selected at all (by any of the other rules), all that directory content will be invisible, even though the sub-directories and their content might have been selected by one of the rules.
    But with element * /main/LATEST, you are sure all the elements will be visible, at the version selected by your rules, or, by default, at /main/LATEST.


    That being said, re-reading your config spec, you can replace the last two lines with:

    element * /main/LATEST -mkbranch PROJ_1.5.0
    

    .../main/LATEST makes no sense: it means “main coming from any other branch”, which isn’t what you would see in a normal config spec: all the other branches comes from main, not the reverse.

    So with that last rule, not only you are sure you will see all the elements, but if you checkout them, you will create and go into branch PROJ_1.5.0.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an iPhone SDK project that is supposed to build a static library
I have a weird case in my rails development that I'm not able to
We are using base clear case with dynamic views on Linux. In our environment
I have a base class Foo that is concrete and contains 30 methods which
I have a C# GUI application that references a Managed C++ project, which requires
My base class has properties that are used by a subclass. where should Release
In base class constructors I always see a parameterless constructor, like so: public abstract
MY base table have two colums assume col1,col2. col1 have id, col2 have many
I've heavily edited this question because responses indicated I wasn't being clear problem: UI
Well im trying to create a custom container class that contains in my case

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.