Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 92573
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T23:12:29+00:00 2026-05-10T23:12:29+00:00

In a bunch o’ places in my code, I have something like this: public

  • 0

In a bunch o’ places in my code, I have something like this:

public Class mySpecialMethod() {   return MySpecialClass.class; } 

which causes the warning

Class is a raw type. References to generic type Class should be parameterized.

But, if I replace

Class

with

Class<? extends Object>

the warning goes away.

Is this simple practice ok, or could it cause trouble later?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T23:12:29+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 11:12 pm

    It’s the correct thing to do only if there really is no common base class or interface that the Class object needs to represent.

    Also Class<?> is effectively the same as Class<? extends Object>.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a bunch of business class with autoproperties : public class A {
I have a bunch of code in a routine that looks a bit like
I have a bunch of php arrays that look like this (please don't ask
I have a bunch of objects in a class hierarchy and would like to
I have a bunch of constants declared like this: #define kConstant0 @Cow #define kConstant1
I have a bunch of strings in php that all look like this: 10
I have a bunch of Rails 3.1 controllers which all have very similar testing
I have a bunch of images that loo like PHO_123456_12345678.jpg and I want to
I have a bunch of files which contain an ascii header with a time
I essentially have a bunch of data objects which map timestamps in milliseconds to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.