Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3611712
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T21:54:34+00:00 2026-05-18T21:54:34+00:00

In a code review today, I stumbled across the following bit of code (slightly

  • 0

In a code review today, I stumbled across the following bit of code (slightly modified for posting):

while (!initialized)
{
  // The thread can start before the constructor has finished initializing the object.
  // Can lead to strange behavior. 
  continue;
}

This is the first few lines of code that runs in a new thread. In another thread, once initialization is complete, it sets initialized to true.

I know that the optimizer could turn this into an infinite loop, but what’s the best way to avoid that?

  • volatile – considered harmful
  • calling an isInitialized() function instead of using the variable directly – would this guarantee a memory barrier? What if the function was declared inline?

Are there other options?

Edit:

Should have mentioned this sooner, but this is portable code that needs to run on Windows, Linux, Solaris, etc. We use mostly use Boost.Thread for our portable threading library.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T21:54:35+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 9:54 pm

    Calling a function won’t help at all; even if a function is not declared inline, its body can still be inlined (barring something extreme, like putting your isInitialized() function in another library and dynamically linking against it).

    Two options that come to mind:

    • Declare initialized as an atomic flag (in C++0x, you can use std::atomic_flag; otherwise, you’ll want to consult the documentation for your threading library for how to do this)

    • Use a semaphore; acquire it in the other thread and wait for it in this thread.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Can i get the source code for a WAMP stack installer somewhere? Any help
I'm in the process of porting some code from Linux to Mac OS X.
Let say I have the following desire, to simplify the IConvertible's to allow me
I have a project that adds elements to an AutoCad drawing. I noticed that
I would like to get a sum from a column, with and without a
(please excuse that I didn't use aliases). I would like my query output to
I'm getting an error here that says I haven't defined a method, but it
I am using a 3rd-party rotator object, which is providing a smooth, random rotation
Has anyone got EclipseLink MOXy (I'm using eclipselink 2.1.0) to work with Java 5?
I make a distributed embedded application that will make use of several micro-controllers. The

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.