Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7723297
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T04:24:27+00:00 2026-06-01T04:24:27+00:00

In a reply to a post I made the other day Dimitre pointed out,

  • 0

In a reply to a post I made the other day Dimitre pointed out, correctly of course, that I had given an XSLT 2 answer to an XSLT 1 question.

However, he also upbraided me for posting an answer that hadn’t been tested. I had in fact tested it and even though the version attribute was set to “1.0” and I used an XSLT 2 replace function every worked with errors or warnings.

So this raised a question – what does the version attribute mean if it doesn’t restrict the language to a particular version?

I did try reading the w3 spec but my eyes started to bleed.

FWIW: I use Oxygen and Saxon 9.3 EE

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T04:24:28+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 4:24 am

    Firstly, the XSLT specification says how an XSLT processor interprets the version attribute, but it doesn’t constrain what pieces of software other than an XSLT processor do with it. For example, an IDE (such as XML Spy) might look at the version attribute and use it to decide whether to launch an XSLT 1.0 or XSLT 2.0 processor. Once an XSLT 1.0 or 2.0 processor is launched, its behaviour is controlled by the relevant spec.

    What an XSLT 1.0 processor does with the version attribute is defined by the XSLT 1.0 specification; what a 2.0 processor does is defined by the XSLT 2.0 spec.

    The XSLT 1.0 spec says that if the version is NOT 1.0, the processor runs in forwards compatibility mode. This basically means that it does its best to ignore constructs that aren’t defined in the 1.0 spec. So if your stylesheet says version=”2.0″, and you run it with a 1.0 processor, then an attribute that is new in 2.0 like xsl:sort/@collation will be ignored. An instruction that isn’t recognized causes a failure only if it is actually executed, and if it has no xsl:fallback child instruction to give a fallback behaviour for 1.0 processors. The design principle is that using 2.0 constructs should not cause a 1.0 processor to fail; wherever possible, it should cause it to run with some kind of fallback behaviour.

    The XSLT 2.0 specification (which controls the behaviour of a 2.0 processor) distinguishes verion<2.0, version=2.0, and version>2.0. When version<2.0, the processor runs in “backwards compatible mode”. This doesn’t mean that 2.0 constructs are rejected; rather it means that 1.0 constructs are executed with semantics as close as possible to those defined in the 1.0 specification. For example, all arithmetic is carried out as double floating point, even if the operands are decimals. When version>2.0, the processor runs in forwards compatible mode, which is very like forwards compatible mode in the 1.0 specification: it means that if you use XSLT 3.0 constructs, the processor will do its best to ignore them or execute fallback instructions.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In a different post I got a reply that tells about Repetitive SQL. Could
Hi I have a post model that :has_many :reply, when using searchlogic, doing Post.reply_content_like(search),
I need some kind of Twitter feed functionality that allows people to post/reply to
I'm trying to write a file from an Http post reply to a file
in the post located here Andrew Finnell's reply was by far the most helpful
I have a Post model object that has reference to a parent object. The
If you take a look on this post, you will see that there is
I was reading the following post How to correctly use IHttpModule * Now lets
Reading this blog post about HttpOnly cookies made me start thinking, is it possible
I have made a lookup table that allows you to blend two single-byte channels

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.