Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8226985
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T15:57:58+00:00 2026-06-07T15:57:58+00:00

In a situation where I am assigning an object to an ivar which the

  • 0

In a situation where I am assigning an object to an ivar which the object may already be assigned to, is there any benefit to first checking whether it is already assigned to that ivar.

For example, is there any benefit to code A over code B?

A

if (ivar != anObject)
{
    ivar = anObject;
}

B

ivar = anObject;
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T15:57:59+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 3:57 pm

    its not strictly necessary, I believe the @property/@synthesize generated setters do this as an optimisation and to stop unneseccary memory management calls on the same object (for a strong property the old object is released and the new one is retained, but if they are the same pointer the end result is the retain count is unchanged)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a similar situation to this question , which was already posted. Koraktor
I'm doing some testing and ran into this bizarre situation: The first case (assigning
Here is the situation, I have 3 instances, one is a manager, for assigning
Situation: I have an index page which loads pages into it with ajax as
I have quite a simple situation. I've got 3 objects: an object called TrainingConsultant
First of all, I am not sure that it is a good design to
Situation I'm implementing a Listener for PHPUnit that will record test results to a
Situation I've got a worker thread that's being triggered by a condition_variable to do
Situation: I have many gzipped input files that I want to process in a
Hi folks hi have a very interesting situation. i have a viewmodel that requires

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.