Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1000805
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T07:34:15+00:00 2026-05-16T07:34:15+00:00

In a Unit Test (in Visual Studio 2008) I want to compare the content

  • 0

In a Unit Test (in Visual Studio 2008) I want to compare the content of a large object (a list of custom types, to be precise) with a stored reference of this object. The goal is to make sure, that any later refactorings of the code produces the same object content.

Discarded Idea:
A first thought was to serialize to XML, and then compare the hardcoded strings or a file content. This would allow for easy finding of any difference. However since my types are not XML serializable without a hack, I must find another solution. I could use binary serialization but this will not be readable anymore.

Is there a simple and elegant solution to this?

EDIT: According to Marc Gravell’s proposal I do now like this:

using (MemoryStream stream = new MemoryStream())
        {
            //create actual graph using only comparable properties
            List<NavigationResult> comparableActual = (from item in sparsed
                                                       select new NavigationResult
                                                       {
                                                           Direction = item.Direction,
                                                           /*...*/
                                                           VersionIndication = item.VersionIndication
                                                       }).ToList();

            (new BinaryFormatter()).Serialize(stream, comparableActual);
            string base64encodedActual = System.Convert.ToBase64String(stream.GetBuffer(), 0, (int)stream.Length);//base64 encoded binary representation of this                
            string base64encodedReference = @"AAEAAAD....";//this reference is the expected value
            Assert.AreEqual(base64encodedReference, base64encodedActual, "The comparable part of the sparsed set is not equal to the reference.");
        }

In essence I do select the comparable properties first, then encode the graph, then compare it to a similarly encoded reference.
Encoding enables deep comparison in a simple way. The reason I use base64 encoding is, that I can easily store the reference it in a string variable.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T07:34:16+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 7:34 am

    I would still be inclined to use serialization. But rather than having to know the binary, just create an expected graph, serialize that. Now serialize the actual graph and compare bytes. This is only useful to tell you that there is a difference; you’d need inspection to find what, which is a pain.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm looking into using Visual Studio 2008's built in unit test projects instead of
I was running my first Visual Studio 2008 Unit Test with a WCF Service
If I open a solution in Visual Studio 2008 and run a unit test
For managing unit tests in Visual Studio, I use the Test List Editor. There's
Using Visual Studio 2008 for a unit test, one of the unit tests has
I am a rookie was using the Visual Studio 2008 built-in Unit Testing components,
Is it possible to generate a report from Visual Studio 2008's integrated unit tests?
I have a bunch of repository classes which I want to unit-test using Visual
How do you unit test a large MFC UI application? We have a few
I have a Boost unit test case which causes the object under test to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.