Home/ Questions/Q 128211
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-11T05:35:57+00:00

In an ASP.Net application, the user clicks a button on the webpage and this

  • 0

In an ASP.Net application, the user clicks a button on the webpage and this then instantiates an object on the server through the event handler and calls a method on the object. The method goes off to an external system to do stuff and this could take a while. So, what I would like to do is run that method call in another thread so I can return control to the user with ‘Your request has been submitted’. I am reasonably happy to do this as fire-and-forget, though it would be even nicer if the user could keep polling the object for status.

What I don’t know is if IIS allows my thread to keep running, even if the user session expires. Imagine, the user fires the event and we instantiate the object on the server and fire the method in a new thread. The user is happy with the ‘Your request has been submitted’ message and closes his browser. Eventually, this users session will time out on IIS, but the thread may still be running, doing work. Will IIS allow the thread to keep running or will it kill it and dispose of the object once the user session expires?

EDIT: From the answers and comments, I understand that the best way to do this is to move the long-running processing outside of IIS. Apart from everything else, this deals with the appdomain recycling problem. In practice, I need to get version 1 off the ground in limited time and has to work inside an existing framework, so would like to avoid the service layer, hence the desire to just fire off the thread inside IIS. In practice, ‘long running’ here will only be a few minutes and the concurrency on the website will be low so it should be okay. But, next version definitely will need splitting into a separate service layer.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. You can accomplish what you want, but it is typically a bad idea. Several ASP.NET blog and CMS engines take this approach, because they want to be installable on a shared hosting system and not take a dependency on a windows service that needs to be installed. Typically they kick off a long running thread in Global.asax when the app starts, and have that thread process queued up tasks.

    In addition to reducing resources available to IIS/ASP.NET to process requests, you also have issues with the thread being killed when the AppDomain is recycled, and then you have to deal with persistence of the task while it is in-flight, as well as starting the work back up when the AppDomain comes back up.

    Keep in mind that in many cases the AppDomain is recycled automatically at a default interval, as well as if you update the web.config, etc.

    If you can handle the persistence and transactional aspects of your thread being killed at any time, then you can get around the AppDomain recycling by having some external process that makes a request on your site at some interval – so that if the site is recycled you are guaranteed to have it start back up again automatically within X minutes.

    Again, this is typically a bad idea.

    EDIT: Here are some examples of this technique in action:

    Community Server: Using Windows Services vs. Background Thread to Run Code at Scheduled Intervals Creating a Background Thread When Website First Starts

    EDIT (from the far distant future) – These days I would use Hangfire.

    • 0