Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
In an earlier question encodeForHtml() vs htmlEditFormat(), how are they different, it seems like the new encodeForHtml() & encodeForURL() functions are superior to htmlEditFormat() & urlFormat() respectively.
Should the esapi-based encodeForXXX functions be used in favor of the existing ones? Should the 2 older functions be deprecated?
Thank you.
I have no idea if the two older functions would be deprecated. But I would say that using the new functions would be a good idea, unless you need to support backward compatibility.