Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7653201
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T11:58:14+00:00 2026-05-31T11:58:14+00:00

In an embedded system (2.4 kernel) I need raw socket access to the eth0

  • 0

In an embedded system (2.4 kernel) I need raw socket access to the eth0 interface from a process not running as root.

I tried to address this problem by setting the CAP_NET_RAW capability from the command line and programmatically using cap_set_proc(), both with no success. It seems that I do not have the permission to do so, in the program I get an EPERM error, on the command line

Failed to set cap’s on process `1586′: (Operation not permitted)

Is there an easier way to do what I want? If not, what steps are necessary to successfully set the CAP_NET_RAW capability?

EDIT: I have root access, but running the process permanently as root is no option. The version of libcap is 1.10, there is no ‘setcap’ binary, but a ‘setpcaps’.

EDIT – answering George Skoptsov:

If I get you right, your suggestion is to start a process with setuid, then set the CAP_NET_RAW capability and then drop the privileges. I tried this with the following code, but it does not seem to work, even though the caps command do not return errors. With the seteuid() commented out, raw access works, but only since the process is running as root then:

cap_t caps = cap_get_proc();
cap_value_t cap_list[1];
cap_list[0] = CAP_NET_RAW;
if (cap_set_flag(caps, CAP_EFFECTIVE, 1, cap_list, CAP_SET) == -1)
{
    printf("cap_set_flag error");
}
if (cap_set_proc(caps) == -1)
{
    printf("cap_set_proc error");
}

if (seteuid(getuid()) != 0) 
{
    printf("seteuid error");
}

function_that_needs_raw_access();

Thanks for your help.
Chris

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T11:58:16+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 11:58 am

    Generally, you need root permissions to receive raw packets on an interface. This restriction is a security precaution, because a process that receives raw packets gains access to communications of all other processes and users using that interface.

    However, if you have access to root on the machine, you can use the setuid flag to give your process root privileges even when the process is executed as a non-root user.

    First, ensure that this capability is set successfully when the process is run as root. Then use

    sudo chown root process
    sudo chmod ugo+s process 
    

    to set root as owner of the process and set the setuid flag. Then check that the capability is set when the process is run by other users. Because this process will now have all superuser privileges, you should observe security precautions, and drop the privileges as soon as your code no longer requires it (after enabling the CAP_NET_RAW).

    You can follow this method to ensure you’re dropping them properly.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an embedded system running Linux where I need to write to a
For an embedded system I need to place a few data structures at fixed
I have an embedded system (ARM 9263) running an RTOS, IAR tools. The system
I'm working on an embedded system. The directory /root/txpa/images/current/application/bin contains the file qt.conf ,
We've got a system running XP embedded, with COM2 being a hardware RS485 port.
I am writing an embedded system multimedia application where support to play from USB
I am working on an embedded system running Linux on a DSP. Now we
I have one doubt. I need to write site on embedded system ( memory
Assume we have a very small embedded system consisting only of the linux kernel
I have an embedded system that has multiple (>20) tasks running at different priorities.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.