Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8018641
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T21:10:34+00:00 2026-06-04T21:10:34+00:00

In another question it is recommended to use .gitattributes in order to keep the

  • 0

In another question it is recommended to use .gitattributes in order to keep the file tracked but not merged in different branch, but my use case below seems not working..

mkdir git
cd git
git init
echo "B" > b.txt
git add b.txt 
git commit -m 'Initial commit'

echo "b.txt merge=keepMine" > .gitattributes
git add .gitattributes 
git config merge.keepMine.name "always keep mine during merge"
git config merge.keepMine.driver "keepMine.sh %O %A %B"
git commit -m 'Ignore b.txt'

git checkout -b test # Create a branch
git checkout master # Back to master and make change
echo "Only in master" > b.txt
git commit -a -m 'In master'

git checkout test
git merge master # The change in b.txt is being merged...

Any idea? Thanks..

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T21:10:35+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 9:10 pm

    I suspect that it did not work because there were no merge conflicts.

    However, I can confirm that git merge master --strategy=ours works as expected.

    This might be what you’re looking for: How to tell Git to always select my local version

    If you want to specify a specific merge strategy for a specific file, what you really need to do is to write a custom merge driver and specify in your repository configuration that you want that merge driver to be used as the default. See the link above on how to use it.

    In short, the reason it does not work in your use case is because your use case is not a merge. It only portrays a bunch of changes on master with a temporary branch called test being created and then moved up to master later on. You never actually introduce a commit while you’re on the test branch.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In another question , I asked something similar but I ended up just posting
In another question I came across two different ways of doing a string replacement.
This question is kind of related to another question but I have a specific
Time for another newbie question, I fear. I'm attempting to use Python 3.2.2 (the
Another question related to this one . I have a List<SortableObjects> that is the
Another question of mine about optimizing Objective C programs inspired the following: does anyone
In another question, the answer states that on Unixes with /proc , the really
In another question , the accepted answer suggested replacing a (very cheap) if statement
In another question I asked (why is Rake test so slow ), part of
In another question I had the problem to port the code: unsigned long stack[]

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.