Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 221159
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T19:00:26+00:00 2026-05-11T19:00:26+00:00

In another SO question, I’ve seen several people recommend me to always use TryGetValue.

  • 0

In another SO question, I’ve seen several people recommend me to always use TryGetValue.

While I always use TryGetValue over the Contains?/Access pattern, I avoid this pattern on purpose when I expect the key to always be in the dictionary. I then go for a direct indexer access, so that an exception is raised if the key isn’t there, because something unexpected really happened (i.e. the key wasn’t in the dictionary while I expect it to).

Since there seems to be a general consensus against my “best-practice” (3 out of 4 people on the post I mentioned explicitly advised to use TryGetValue at all time), I’m eager to read an extended discussion on that topic…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T19:00:26+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:00 pm

    No, you’re entirely right IMO.

    There’s no point in doing:

    if (dict.TryGetValue(key, out value))
    {
        // whatever
    }
    else
    {
        throw new SomeException("key '" + key + "' wasn't in dictionary");
    }
    

    The only benefit of that over:

    value = dict[key];
    

    is that you get a more explicit exception message… but at the cost of readability, IMO.

    It’s like casting vs using as – an exception is the right result when the state is “wrong”, so use the form which gives that behaviour.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In another question - Getting directory listing from SVN for use in ANT dropdown
Another question about the C standard. I have tested this and I always get
In another question, Mark speaks highly of IDEs, saying some people still just dont
In another question on stackoverflow I got a hint that I can use thread
In another question it was recommend that I try resetting a remote tracking branch
Another question related to this one . I have a List<SortableObjects> that is the
Another question of mine about optimizing Objective C programs inspired the following: does anyone
Answering another question about how const string data was stored in an executable a
From another question I recently posted, it seems that Classic ASP might not be
In another question, a user posted the following reflog: 8c48bab HEAD@{16}: checkout: moving from

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.